
The new corticosteroid ciclesonide has been evaluated in various studies to assess its efficacy and adverse effect profile in asthma. However, there are no data comparing the effects of high-dose ciclesonide with those of fluticasone propionate on airway and systemic outcomes in patients with moderate persistent asthma.
The relative effects of 4 weeks of treatment with ciclesonide and fluticasone propionate on airway hyper-reactivity, exhaled nitric oxide levels, lung function, symptoms, and quality of life were compared in 14 patients with moderately persistent asthma. Both drugs significantly improved airway outcomes in terms of methacholine bronchial hyper-responsiveness and exhaled nitric oxide levels. Fluticasone propionate 2000 µg daily but not ciclesonide 1600 µg daily significantly suppressed hypothalamic pituitary adrenal (HPA) axis outcomes, overnight 10 h urinary cortisol levels being lower after fluticasone propionate administration than after ciclesonide administration.
The efficacy of a new medication depends upon comparison with an existing medication that is used in the community for the treatment of a particular condition. Inhaled corticosteroid, namely beclomethasone, budesonide and fluticasone, have been used in the treatment of asthma. The introduction of newer inhaled corticosteroid would depend on the efficacy of the medication in comparison with existing medication. Ciclesonide has been evaluated in various studies essentially looking at the adverse effect profile and its effectiveness in asthma. There are no reports of head-to-head comparisons with the standard inhaled corticosteroid asthma. This study compared the effects of ciclesonide with those of fluticasone propionate, albeit in a small population of moderately persistent asthmatics. The absence of significant differences between the group receiving fluticasone propionate and the group receiving ciclesonide in airway parameters, including spirometry, PEF, symptoms and Mini-AQLQ (Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire) score, suggest that ciclesonide could prove to be a useful option in the management of asthma. With regard to safety, the treatment period of 4 weeks may not be adequate to cause significant suppression of the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis and long-term trials are required to evaluate the effects of ciclesonide on the HPA axis.
The findings of these studies, coupled with the results of earlier studies on the pharmacology, pharmacokinetics and efficacy of ciclesonide, indicate great promise for this new inhaled steroid in the treatment of asthma. The higher bioavailability and improved plasma binding of this steroid provide it with greater efficacy and minimal side effects. Furthermore, ciclesonide nasal spray with its minimal effect on the hypothalamic–pituitary–adrenal axis, could be useful in the treatment of children with asthma. However, data on the long-term effects on the HPA axis with ciclesonide are necessary if they are to be considered to be safe medications with no effect on the HPA axis.


